ai, minat bola jugak dema?.. heheh

salam ziarah.. wssalam.

The native of this land a.k.a. son of the soil are the native (Dusun, Iban, Kadazan, etc) of Borneo and the Orang Asli (Dayak, Jakun, Sakai, etc) in Peninsula. Not you malay arrogant pieces of shit!

Before the arrival of Islam into Malaya, the different races live in harmony without questioning race or religion. They may be cultural different but they accepted each other.

After independence, race was used by the Umno racist, and then formulated the NEP, which divided everyone. The Umno fascist use Islam in schools, universities and workplaces to segregate, and in the name of fighting PAS.

The modus operandi of Umno has always be, divide and rule, and the devil is in the detail and implementation of the religious department.

Umno is king in creating diversion, when they are cornered, use race and religion. Race and religion is the most explosive issue and they have used it successfully since independence.

All this is done to perpetuate their hold on political power. It is for Umno benefits to play the race card, because this is the only way to ensure their hold on to political power. And 50 long years have proven them right. The race card works well and works every time!

They have succeeded in keeping the races apart socially, and fanned animosity amongst the races with their discriminatory and racist politics.

All give politically reasoning – well here goes a correct one – malay is lazy because of Islam.

How can one pray 5 times and yet be expected to be productive? Wait for the foreigners to come and set up their factory and having to cater for Islam needs!

If malays embrace other religion then there is hope for Malaysia otherwise your hope is in the existence of Umno terrorist liars – don’t count on them being there forever – we are factoring in Umno racist absence in our business plan!

The problem with malays is that they forget too easily. It was the Chinese, Indians and Malays who fought for the independence.

The NEP was design to help the malays catch up with the Chinese and the Indians. Now looks like after 40 years, malays are still behind and very proud of it.

Still want to receive handouts from the government! Still afraid to fight it out on fair ground with the Chinese, Indians and other races! Fearful is the malay race!

Without the government subsidies and supports – I don’t know how many malay businesses will still stand? So when can we see some towering malays and who dare to refuse government help and still succeed?

Grabbing other people success and call it your own success is not success but a disgrace!

Their laziness caused the nation economy to slump and resources are wasted. They take 5 days to complete a day work. Malays always think that they are helping the other races when they are lazy. For God sake, please wake up! You are doing it for your own, not for anybody!

Majority of the nation need to be educated again. On the meaning of Malaysia.

You have to pay for it, not given to you, never free, unless you steal, rob and murder!

You don’t own wealth because you want it then lay sleeping and start threatening.

Go work for it and earn it – you can have more if you have the ability and energy.

I also want to be a billionaire!

Malays were part of the migration of Polynesian peoples whose original home was Yunnan in China to South East Asia in what is known as Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia……….

At that time the Orang Asli were already well settled in the malay Peninsula, so that makes them the most legitimate of the bumis.

Malays were animists then for hundreds of years until Indians crossed Bay of Bengal to South East Asia and spread Indian and Hindu culture to the peoples there.

Hence we had the great Hindu kingdoms which later also became Buddhist kingdoms of Langkasuka, Srivijaya, Majapahit – but main thing to note is that racially the peoples were malays and speak old malay language.

Islam only came to South East Asia from 1400 after foundation of Malacca by Parameswara. Again from India crossed Bay of Bengal and spread Islam to South East Asia. Malacca sultans were among the first converts and the rest is history.

Please note that the malays have been Muslims for only 600 years and have been Hindus/Buddhists very much longer – at least 2000 years. Malay culture is very much influenced by Hindu culture including Sanskrit words like the wayang kulit, raja, maharaja, etc.

Unlike Javanese, who are proud of their Hindu/Buddhist past reflected in great empires like Srivijaya and Majapahit, malays are generally ashamed to dwell on their pre Islamic Hindu/Buddhist past.

On the contrary some malays try to be like the Arab wannabes, trying to cleanse the malays of their Hindu/Buddhist past – in this even the songs and films of P Ramlee become victimized!

If Islam had not come to South East Asia, malays would still be Hindus/Buddhists like the Balinese which is not a bad idea, as Balinese are considered very peaceful people.

himself in dismissing a suit brought by Perak PR speaker against the state BN speaker.

Judge Azahar rejected Sivakumar suit to seek damages from Ganesan for assault and false imprisonment during the chaotic and

violent state assembly sitting on May 7. He said the court had no jurisdiction to hear the case due to Federal Constitution Article

72 stipulating that – the validity of any proceeding in any state assembly cannot be questioned in any court.

And yet in the same breath he declared that – the decision of the legislative assembly to remove the plaintiff as speaker and to

appoint the defendant was conclusive and had been fairly determined by the state assembly on May 7, 2009.

Now, the crux of the entire contention between the two speakers is: who is on the right side of law in the violent tussle for the

speaker chair on May 7?

By declaring Ganesan as the rightful speaker, Judge Azahar is in fact making a legal judgment. Is that not a breach of Article 72?

How come he has no jurisdiction to hear Sivakumar grievances but has jurisdiction to judge Ganesan as legal speaker? Is that

not a contradiction of the highest order?

Apart from this atrocious double standard applied by the judge, the main flaw of the judgment is the inability to differentiate

between assembly proceeding and criminal behaviour. What Sivakumar is seeking is redress for the unlawful physical violence

inflicted on him. And Article 72 covers only businesses conducted in the assembly – not unlawful and criminal act.

Judge Azahar has therefore wrongly used Article 72 to come to his judgment. To make it very clear that this is the case, I will

quote in full the relevant clauses in Article 72 (Clauses 1 & 2) and explain the reasons why.

Clause 1: The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court.

Clause 2: No body shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or vote given by him when taking

part in proceedings of the Legislative Assembly of any State or of any committee thereof.

Note the operative words “proceedings” in Clause 1 and “anything said or any vote given” in Clause 2.

It is abundantly clear what Article 72 refers to are the speeches and resolutions made in the assembly, not any criminal or

unlawful act.

But what happened on May 7 was complete pandemonium and chaos in the assembly hall. There was no chance to conduct any

business at all, least of all any resolution passed. In fact the only business done on that day was the address by the Perak Regent

Raja Nazrin Shah.

And how was Sivakumar replaced by Ganesan during that pandemonium?

While Sivakumar was sitting in the speaker chair, hordes of police personnel entered the assembly hall, allegedly on Ganesan

order, and physically lifted, carried, dragged and moved speaker Sivakumar into a room where he was forcibly detained until

the assembly sitting was over.

And as soon as Sivakumar was removed from the hall, police personnel escorted Ganesan into the hall and ushered him to the

speaker chair, with police personnel making a line to stand guard in front of Ganesan to prevent any assemblymen from reaching

the speaker chair.

The entire tragedy-comedy was stage managed by the police, and it is therefore more appropriate to say that while Sivakumar

was elected by the assembly through a reolution, Ganesan was physically planted into the speaker chair by the police. And that

about sums up what happened on that tragic hilarious day.

And since Judge Azahar appears to be so respectful of the constitutional principle of separation of power as demonstrated by

his professed adherence to Article 72, is it not puzzling that he should have chosen to ignore completely the heinous violation of

the doctrine of separation of power when hordes of police personnel invaded the assembly to physically replace one speaker

with another?

Is it not another shining example of double standard in the Malaysia Boleh tradition?

After the series of judicial decisions that appear to wantonly trample the constitution and the law following the shameful power

grab in Perak, the latest low represented by Azahar decision makes us wonder how much lower our judiciary can sink into, as

many more judicial decisions in the same series are still pending.

bebas atau mcm mana?

tajuk lak macam mana?

bleh ustaz info dekat saya mcm mana?

Asran Alias
asranlap@gmail.com
asranlap@yahoo.com.sg
asranlap@perdana.um.edu.my